Day 104
Over the past 25 years, Richard Clarke has become the friendly, erudite and personable face of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, one of the nation’s most prominent healthcare groups. According to Modern Healthcare, he regularly ranks among the top 100 most powerful people in healthcare. Most people who know him aren’t surprised. He’s very intuitive in the area of healthcare administration and he’s a great communicator. I get the sense that he loves what he’s doing.

Richard Clark is CEO of the Healthcare Financial Management Association
“While healthcare reform is a key area for our group, we’ve found that the primary focus of hospitals today is on preparation for significant changes, not necessarily the method of payment.” He is referring to the fact that while payment systems are filled with conflicting incentives, (like getting paid more based on volume rather than quality), healthcare administrators are tightly focused on other areas like budget, organizing clinical relationships (aligning physicians with hospitals) and technology issues. “Clinical processes are being designed with the patient at the center then structures are being built around that,” he says. It’s reminiscent of the emerging “medical home” concept.
I’m hearing a theme on my tour about physicians becoming employed by hospitals. The current environment is too risky to go it alone so physicians are seeking stability. Dick adds a further dimension to this dynamic. “The days of the single standing smaller hospital may be numbered,” he suggests. “The environment is challenging, capital needs remain high and so I think we might see smaller hospitals joining bigger chains.”
He continues: “Our members are focused on three core competencies: true clinical integration that is measured based on patient outcomes not just physician alignment (did your treatment heal you?); risk management based on cost – a quasi-insurance function that could involve population risk (an idea that was discussed at a recent summit in California - “community-based healthcare”); and, better pricing for services. The biggest enabler for better pricing is information technology.” As the saying goes, you can’t improve what you can’t measure. Along these lines I ask him about bundled payment – is it coming? “In theory,” he replies, “yes…there are pilot programs out there like Prometheus that are showing promising results.”
Before I ask the next question, Dick blows off a little steam. “There is some residual anger at banks because of the difficulty hospitals have had accessing credit,” he says, “some continue to have this problem.” While it sounds ironic given how much time banks spend wooing hospital-clients, its true many have scrambled during the global economic meltdown. “This really has to be more of a partnership to work,” he adds.
His comments resonate. Many communities have two vital anchor points – the hospital, typically the largest employer, and the bank. They are often on each other’s Boards and they have a common interest to improve the quality of life in the communities they serve. If one institution has a problem both tend to suffer. A bankrupt hospital can spell disaster to a local economy. A bank that is tight on credit will intensify operating pressure on a hospital. I find that in many cases there is truly a community partnership between the two, and this vital community axis forms one of the key underpinnings of medical banking. Those that don’t understand this simply don’t get medical banking. At its core, its about community leaders sharing a common concern in their neighborhoods about quality of life issues. How the bank wraps it resources around this critical objective forms the content of medical banking dialogue.
When I interviewed some 125 banking CEOs, healthcare administrators and physicians in 1994-1995, I found that there was often times intense focus by bank CEOs on their hospital clients. Sure, there is focus on other businesses, yet I can’t imagine any that provide $30 billion in charity care each year (per the most recent HFMA report at the group’s Payment Reform Summit in DC where 100 top thought leaders met to dialogue solutions for reforming our healthcare payment system).
Bottom line: leveraging core competencies – one in clinical excellence (care providers) and the other in administrative excellence (banks) – provides a good framework for community collaboration for meeting healthcare needs. Banks are waking up to a much more global context for deploying their assets into healthcare…and I might add that there needs to be more dialogue between the groups so that mutual appreciation of resources and sustainable collaboration can occur. There are compelling reasons for linking banking and healthcare today in new ways, beyond credit and new transaction processing, especially as we switch gears into the “health-wealth” paradigm of the future. Good examples of this are Tenant’s recent partnership with a bank in southeast Florida, opening up bank branches to provide health and lifestyle training to consumers. Other banks in Massachusetts and Minneapolis are also advancing what I call the “advanced community care platform.”
I switch gears to ask about Dick Clark, the person. He’s been on my radar screen since 1994 when I had the pleasure of being a student in a class he taught in Denver, CO. I sense a degree of quiet and well-deserved personal satisfaction in his comments, managing such a vibrant professional association. “I’m constantly impressed by the deep level of personal attachment our members have for this organization,” he says. “They genuinely want to do everything they can to improve healthcare.” As I drive off I think that one good reason why they might is because he does. I’m glad he’s at the helm and working hard to avert the dark and ominous clouds that appear to be gathering in the healthcare industry. Until next post…